STRANGE OFFSEASON?
Jeremy Fowler and Dan Graziano offer eight reasons that the 2021 offseason will be unusual:
This NFL offseason is going to be strange. Not as strange, hopefully, as last year’s NFL offseason or even the season that followed, but strange nonetheless. The impact of the still-extant COVID-19 pandemic will linger into 2021 and affect the way teams and player agents do business.
By this point in a normal year, teams have a pretty good idea what the salary cap will be. Everyone is prepping for the combine, where a week spent in close proximity usually helps teams and agents get a feel for how the free-agent market might shake out. And draft prospects are training for televised workouts in spandex shorts.
This year? Projected salary-cap estimates range from $175 million to $190 million as the NFL and the NFLPA continue to discuss where it should be set and the league negotiates new TV contracts with the networks. There is no combine, because a week in which the entire league is pressed together in crowded bars and convention center hallways just doesn’t make sense in 2021. And the draft prospects are going to have to present themselves in entirely new ways.
The fact of the matter, though, is that the NFL managed to have an offseason in 2020, when major chunks of the country were locked down and it was hard to even get a COVID-19 test. It will be able to navigate an offseason in 2021 as well. It’s just that it’s going to be a little bit odd in certain areas. With free agency just about four weeks away (the new league year begins March 17), we wanted to take a look at a few of those:
Salary-cap planning for this year and beyond
In most years, teams aren’t scared of the salary cap, an accounting tool they can circumvent by a few contract restructures or veteran releases. They worry more about the cash — how much an owner is willing to spend — than keeping a book.
This year is a bit different. Close to one-third of the league is operating in the red thanks to a $175 million salary-cap floor due to lost revenue in the pandemic. The Eagles and Saints face a combined $110 million-plus projected cap deficit as it stands.
Those teams weren’t worried before because the salary cap was increasing by about $10 million each year. This time, the $198.2 million cap teams used all of last year currently projects to be around $181 million for 2021.
The league and the players’ union are negotiating for what the final number will be, and it depends on a few unprecedented factors. The current negotiations center on how much of the expected drop in the cap should be “borrowed” from future years — i.e., if revenue projections say the cap should drop by $20 million this year, is it better to drop it by $10 million this year and $10 million next year instead? Also, if one or more of the broadcast deals gets done in the coming weeks and the owners exercise their option to expand the regular season to 17 games, the number could end up being higher than expected.
“It’s a real concern,” said one league exec who manages contracts and cap for an NFL team. “There are major impacts teams are gonna feel over the next month that they aren’t used to.”
That includes, in the estimates of many inside the league, an abnormally large number of veteran cuts leaguewide. We’ve already seen big names released or informed of a pending release — Texans defensive end J.J. Watt, Broncos cornerback A.J. Bouye, Raiders wide receiver Tyrell Williams — before Valentine’s Day. Some teams figure they know what they have to do to get compliant and are working downhill earlier than usual. Some teams are budgeting for the $175 million figure, which is the lowest it can be per last summer’s agreement between the league and the players, figuring it’s better to have unexpected surplus than deficit. Others will stay patient, waiting for more clarity on the final figures.
Street free agents will flood the market and boost an already crowded pool of available talent at a time when some teams are hesitant to pay top dollar. As one veteran NFL agent pointed out, “If you have high-earning veterans and you aren’t proactively approaching teams about restructuring deals, you are doing a disservice.”
The cap issues won’t curb spending altogether, but a few themes have emerged in talking with teams and players:
The top players will be paid well while the middle class will be marginalized.
Some teams will lean heavily on one-year deals.
Some high-profile free agents might prefer one-year deals that allow them to hit the market again a year from now, when the cap will presumably go back up.
Other teams might actually be aggressive spenders because they think they are getting a pandemic discount. Those teams can sell players on increased guarantees and signing bonuses in exchange for less overall money.
“I know teams are concerned about 2022, too, because we don’t know how many fans will be in the stands next [season],” said one AFC exec. “I know the [upcoming] TV deals will help, but at some point you need that revenue from stadiums.”
Franchise-tag implications
Ah, another year of the franchise tag, a convenient outlet for a team to avoid a long-term marriage with a star player.
Last offseason, 14 players received a franchise-tag designation, and two of them — Chiefs defensive tackle Chris Jones (four years, $80 million), Tennessee Titans running back Derrick Henry (four years, $50 million) — entered the season with a long-term deal in place.
That reality doesn’t align with the spirit of the tag, which was established as a placeholder to keep stars out of free agency for four-plus months while negotiating an extension. In many cases last year, the two sides weren’t close, a deviation from a more successful 2019, when five of the six franchised players got deals out of it.
This year will create unique challenges for both sides since the tags will inevitably pay less. (Remember: The tag is calculated by taking the average of the top five players’ cap percentage at the position for the 2020 season or 120% of the player’s previous year salary — whichever is greater.)
Projections at Spotrac and Pro Football Focus show manageable numbers based on a $180 million cap: quarterback ($24.8 million), offensive line ($13.6 million), running back ($8.5 million), wide receiver ($15.8 million), tight end ($9.5 million), cornerback ($14.9 million), defensive end ($15.9 million), defensive tackle ($13.7 million), linebacker ($14.6 million), offensive line ($13.6 million), punter or kicker ($4.4 million). That’s about a 10-15% decrease from the previous year across the board.
One high-ranking league exec predicted teams will take advantage of the lower numbers by using more tags, especially since one-year deals could be trendy in a suppressed year anyway. Teams have Feb. 23 to March 9 to make these calls.
The Packers, for example, would be wise to at least consider using the tag on running back Aaron Jones at that $8.5 million number. In Tampa Bay, the tag is a strong option for receiver Chris Godwin, who is a priority for the team. Unless the Cowboys reach a long-term agreement with him in the next three weeks, they will assuredly go through this again with quarterback Dak Prescott, who at least has the protection of a second tag, which must increase 120% from the previous year’s number. At $37.7 million, up from $31.4 million, Prescott will have unprecedented leverage in the quarterback market. Dallas could try to get ahead of the tag and sign Prescott sooner than later, although nothing is close as it stands.
Another NFL source predicted about 10 tags in total, figuring the payouts are still fairly high for teams that prefer spreading out signing bonuses over three to five years. The final tally will depend on the conviction of teams that don’t want sneaky-good players leaving their building.
The Panthers, for example, want to do what it takes to keep offensive tackle Taylor Moton. That $13.6 million clip is a good number for a quality left tackle. Paying $14.6 million for a good pass-rusher is a relative bargain, which is why Arizona could tag Haason Reddick after a 12.5-sack season. The tight end numbers have been so low that the Chargers should consider tagging Hunter Henry a second time, costing $12.7 million. Safety John Johnson III for $10.5 million? Some defensive-needy teams would sign up for that, and the Rams have the luxury to choose.
These examples are all over the league. At least two-thirds of the league will be faced with these decisions.
Expect a busy trade market
Quarterbacks are setting this process off. Nearly half the league faces questions at the position. Matthew Stafford asked out of Detroit and got his wish weeks later. Boom, he’s a Ram.
Deshaun Watson, Russell Wilson, Carson Wentz are all unhappy. Aaron Rodgers might belong in that group, too.
Player empowerment at the game’s most important position has deepened intrigue in a suddenly dramatic offseason. Sure, the Seahawks believe they can fix things with Wilson, who wants more offensive line help, and the Texans aren’t honoring Watson’s trade request as of now. But each quarterback is making his points loud and clear.
As one Pro Bowl defensive player recently told us, a clear correlation exists between quarterbacks’ ballooning salaries and their voices growing louder. “Once these guys started making more than $30 million per year, that gives them more power,” the Pro Bowler said.
That doesn’t apply to all quarterbacks, of course. the carousel is spinning so wildly because teams know they have little chance without one. That breeds second chances, with embattled former top-three picks such as Sam Darnold and Marcus Mariota holding value to teams willing to explore options.
Aggressive front offices will be looking to unload assets not just at quarterback but all over the league. As we noted earlier, 10 teams entered this week with a salary-cap deficit. The easiest way to change that? Take big-money players with large cap hits entering the final year or two on a deal and shop their value.
Almost every team has a candidate. Watt leaving Houston once didn’t seem possible, yet here we are. Houston probably could have squeezed a draft pick out of his services but decided to give him a head start on free agency. Maybe the Broncos will do the same with another future Hall of Famer, Von Miller, who has an $18 million option on the final year of his deal. Or, they could gauge trade value for a team looking to flip Miller’s existing deal into a three-year extension to put a contender over the top.
Ravens right tackle Orlando Brown will have a market, and although he hasn’t formally requested a trade, Baltimore knows he wants out because he can’t play left tackle with Ronnie Stanley entrenched there. The 2022 free agent will likely want a new deal as part of a trade. Either way, there will be suitors. The Chargers seem like a natural fit with Sam Tevi likely leaving in free agency. The situation between Brown and the Ravens is unusual — a 24-year-old player entering his fourth year trying to work his way into a more potentially profitable position. Will other teams value him as a left tackle and trade players who indicate as much? Will those same teams want to pay him left tackle money? Would the Dolphins, whose quarterback throws left-handed, bring him in to play right tackle and pay him blindside-protector money?
Eagles tight end Zach Ertz is an obvious trade candidate. Philadelphia can save $8.25 million on the cap by moving on. Contract negotiations before the 2020 season did not go well.
And Patriots corner Stephon Gilmore, with one year left at $7 million — a bargain for a Defensive Player of the Year less than 13 months ago — is a name to watch. His name made the speculative rounds during the trade deadline in October.
Browns receiver Odell Beckham Jr. could drive interest, although he has missed 25 games over the past four seasons due to injury, and in the one full season he did play during that span (2019), he battled through a groin injury. Still, his $15.75 million cap hit isn’t bad for a player of his caliber. Receiver-needy teams hesitant to spend big on Allen Robinson or Kenny Golladay could call Cleveland, which also has high-priced Beckham buddy Jarvis Landry under contract at the same position.
More than ever, executives are willing to at least discuss possibilities with big-ticket players. Thirteen teams have more than $20 million in cap space. Others will get creative while trying to get there.
Players in line for contract extensions
Several teams will make efforts to re-sign stars before March 17, starting with the Giants, who want defensive lineman Leonard Williams in blue for the coming years. His market will be robust.
We’ve been hearing about the Cowboys’ plans to keep Prescott for two years now. The 49ers got close to a deal with left tackle Trent Williams before the regular season ended. They will try again, but premium left tackles rarely hit free agency and Williams will be interested in testing that process. Many around the league expect the Broncos to make a strong push to re-sign safety Justin Simmons, one of the game’s most versatile at the position.
There will be others. But absent the franchise tag, most high-profile free agents are willing to wait this out. They’ve waited this long. Why not become a true free agent?
Also, a good place to look is the first round of the 2017 draft, which produced several star players approaching their fifth-year option year without a new deal.
The Seahawks plan to re-sign safety Jamal Adams, who was worth two first-round picks in a trade with the New York Jets. They can’t let this one play out very long.
T.J. Watt will be looking for a massive deal in line with the highest-paid pass-rushers. Joey Bosa tops that market at $27 million per year, followed by Myles Garrett at $25 million. That’s a starting point for Watt after 42.5 sacks over the past three years. The Steelers have major cap issues and several high-profile free agents on this year’s market, so Watt’s extension might have to wait a bit.
Fred Warner (49ers) and Darius Leonard (Colts), who are both 2022 free agents, can reset the linebacker market this summer.
The Saints can actually help their cap issues by extending corner Marshon Lattimore and offensive tackle Ryan Ramczyk, who are set to make $10 million and $11 million, respectively, on their fifth-year options. Washington’s Jonathan Allen is a key piece to the team’s vaunted defensive line and will be in line for an extension.
As far as veterans playing out a second contract, the Packers must find a way to extend wideout Davante Adams, who is due $12 million in the final year of his deal. He’s a top-three receiver who is well outside the top 10 in pay scale on an obsolete contract. And he’s only 28. Easy decision.
Put a spotlight on Cleveland, which has several young players for whom to plan financially. The Browns set a precedent by extending Garrett despite two years left on his deal, which clears the path for quarterback Baker Mayfield and cornerback Denzel Ward to get theirs early, too.
Mayfield is one of three first-round quarterbacks from 2018 — along with Buffalo’s Josh Allen and Baltimore’s Lamar Jackson — in line for a megadeal. All three will undoubtedly negotiate with their teams, but waiting until 2022, under the umbrella of a healthier cap, isn’t a bad play, either.
Free agents who will likely do better than people might think
Cornerback Shaquill Griffin doesn’t get much fanfare out in Seattle, but he’s a true cover corner and physical tackler. Those guys are paid. He’ll have plenty of suitors. A lot of teams will be in the market for a cornerback help.
Carl Lawson has been a sneaky good pass-rusher in Cincinnati. He just doesn’t have the big sack numbers (20 since 2017). When you ask coaches in the AFC North, they say he’s a problem up front. Bears defensive end Roy Robertson-Harris could get a bigger-than-expected contract, too.
Carl Lawson had 5.5 sacks and two forced fumbles in 2020. David Rosenblum/Icon Sportswire
Rams tight end Gerald Everett isn’t a high-volume player — he had never played more than 450 offensive snaps in a season before this year — but is immensely talented. The question is whether teams look at him as a full-time guy or a situational weapon. But he should have a good market.
Here’s a low-key player to watch: Panthers guard Chris Reed. The former Minnesota State standout just played out a two-year deal in Carolina and acquitted himself well. He’s not a name who screams big money, but he should have a nice deal somewhere. Same could go for another former small-school blocker, Pittsburgh’s Matt Feiler, a Bloomsburg product who is going on three years as a Steelers starter, can play multiple spots on the line. He’ll be hard for Pittsburgh to keep.
There are lots of big names who will flood the receiver market, but there are quality low-key options, too, from Josh Reynolds to Kendrick Bourne and Damiere Byrd. Guys with yards-after-catch ability will have jobs waiting.
How the pre-draft process has changed
Before and throughout the 2020 season, especially as teams pondered the idea of trading 2021 draft picks, we were told over and over that 2021 would be the worst-evaluated draft in league history. That’s likely an overstatement, since technology alone offers more effective evaluation tools than they had in, say, the 1970s. But the point is that April’s draft will force teams to evaluate players far differently — and perhaps less accurately — from what they’re used to.
One thing that keeps coming up in conversations with teams is the medical evaluations that always take place at the combine. Without those, teams worry that information about prospects with health issues will be in short supply. This could lead teams torn between two prospects to lean toward the ostensibly healthier one, and it could put added pressure on prospects who carry health concerns to find ways to prove to teams that they’re healthy enough to get drafted. The league is working to figure out how to get teams this information without any team having an advantage.
Pro days will offer opportunities to evaluate players in combine-type drills, but teams generally view pro days as slanted in favor of the players who are being showcased. They’re working out with their own coaches and their own teammates in familiar environs as opposed to the less biased environment the combine offers. (Exos, a company that trains players, is simulating its own combine later this month.) Prospects are drug-tested at the combine as well, and those results are disseminated to all teams simultaneously.
The upshot is that teams will have less information than usual with which to evaluate draft prospects. There are some who view that as a potential good thing, since sometimes teams feel they’re dealing with information overload during this process. But more likely, there will be more teams feeling as if they’re taking insufficiently educated guesses in certain spots — especially as the draft moves into the later rounds. Round 1 of the draft begins April 29.
New coaches/GMs changing plans
Every year brings new decision-makers in new places, which sometimes means the personnel who fit the old philosophy become expendable under the new. Example: Wide receiver Jamison Crowder was probably the best player on the Jets’ offense in 2020. But his $10 million non-guaranteed salary and his $11.4 million cap hit in the final year of his contract could make him vulnerable to a cap-related cut if new offensive coordinator Mike LaFleur brings in a system that doesn’t lean as hard on the slot receiver.
New coach Dan Campbell and defensive coordinator Aaron Glenn will be installing a new scheme in Detroit, and players who were brought in because of their familiarity with Matt Patricia’s system could be on the way out. Cornerback Desmond Trufant, defensive tackle Danny Shelton, even linebacker Jamie Collins all could be at risk of cut or trade. And since Campbell and Glenn both came from the Saints, they could have their eyes on some of New Orleans’ key free agents, such as edge rusher Trey Hendrickson and safety Marcus Williams.
We know the Seahawks’ quarterback wants more help on the offensive line, but Seattle is also installing a new offensive system under new coordinator Shane Waldron, and the team has its eye on some players who might fit Waldron’s system at tight end and wide receiver. Not that there’s anything wrong with Tyler Lockett and DK Metcalf, but don’t be surprised if the Seahawks add to their stable of offensive skill position players.
Lingering COVID-19 impact on the offseason
With vaccinations ramping up and COVID-19 cases trending down nationwide, there’s hope of a much more normal NFL season with fans in the stands in 2021. But it’s understood in league circles (as it is outside of them) that the pandemic isn’t over yet and won’t be over in time for the usual April start of offseason programs. That could mean a repeat of last year’s offseason programs, which were conducted virtually. The NFLPA has been vocal about wanting to incorporate some of the pandemic-related changes to the NFL offseason going forward. Players believe the fact that the season went as well as it did in spite of the scaled-back offseason program is a sign that the league can get away with less on-field work in the offseason. The NFLPA has been working for years — with some success — to reduce the toll offseason practices take on players’ bodies, and it will continue to push for further changes with that aim.
In-person free-agent and pre-draft visits are likely to be curtailed or strongly regulated, if not eliminated entirely again. With the traditional combine scuttled, teams will rely on individual schools’ pro days and perhaps some locally organized combine-type workouts to conduct the draft evaluations that normally take place in Indianapolis.
As for a return to normal operations, there’s hope in league circles that nationwide vaccinations will have the pandemic in retreat in time for an on-time start for business-as-usual training camps in late July. The league has consistently said it would not attempt to “cut the line” for vaccine distribution, which means players and team personnel would be vaccinated according to where they fit into the schedules in their local areas. It’s also unclear at this time whether the league would require its players to be vaccinated before returning to the field. Decisions on that could have to wait until the latter part of the summer, when they can assess where things stand with the pandemic and the accessibility of vaccines.
The hope, of course, is that 2020 will stand in history as the lone season impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The reality is that its impact will linger into — and possibly through — the 2021 offseason as well.
|