2022 DRAFT
A deep dive on the top QBs in the draft from Todd McShay and John Parolin ofESPN.com – where Parolin looks at the analytic stats to see if they support the subjective analysis of those who just watch the film.
We took the top seven QBs in this class — Malik Willis, Kenny Pickett, Desmond Ridder, Matt Corral, Sam Howell, Carson Strong and Bailey Zappe — and dove in on five key statistical areas. ESPN Stats & Information’s John Parolin pulled two telling stats from each quarterback’s 2021 season for each of those categories, including deep-ball prowess and production under duress. Then NFL draft analyst Todd McShay evaluated the numbers against what he sees on tape, with some additional context from Parolin.
What matches the film, and what doesn’t? Numbers don’t tell the entire story, but they help support and complement evaluations, and sometimes they can even force a scout to go back to the tape and take another look from a different angle. So let’s dig in, beginning with how each quarterback handles pressure.
Who can extend plays under duress?
Under Pressure In 2021
QB TOTAL QBR PRESSURED QB TOTAL QBR BLITZED
Kenny Pickett 18.9 Ridder 87.9
Bailey Zappe 18.8 Pickett 86.6
Carson Strong 12.1 Howell 84.6
Matt Corral 6.2 Zappe 82.9
Desmond Ridder 5.1 Willis 82.2
Sam Howell 3.9 Strong 71.3
Malik Willis 2.5 Corral 42.2
2021 FBS averages: 11.2 under pressure, 66.6 when blitzed
McShay: I love doing this exercise each year because it provides a cross-check. If the numbers line up with what I see on tape, great. If they don’t, that’s when I go take another look. And while all of these categories matter, the pressure numbers are probably the biggest factor. What happens when things break down and quarterbacks have to make quick decisions with NFL pass-rushers in their face? What we see here sort of speaks to the 2022 class as a whole — four of the top seven aren’t even above the FBS average in QBR under pressure. That’s not great.
Parolin: We’ve done this exercise for the past three years, and just four of 34 included quarterbacks in that time have been below their respective FBS averages in this category — Clayton Thorson, Daniel Jones, Jarrett Stidham and Nate Stanley. So four out of seven quarterbacks failing to hit that threshold is alarming. Pitt’s Kenny Pickett led the way last season, but his 18.9 QBR under pressure ranked 34th among 125 qualified FBS quarterbacks. And it wouldn’t have ranked in the top four in any of the previous three years of this project. In fact, the number would have fell behind nine of the 12 QBs we looked at last year
McShay: I do think Pickett’s mobility and pocket presence are understated areas of his game. He can feel the pressure coming without dropping his eyes and typically knows when to get rid of the ball. On tape, he frequently hangs tough in the pocket and locates late-opening targets with pressure closing in. His game is built on throwing accurately from the pocket, but he has the maneuverability to buy time and still make a play under duress.
Parolin: Pickett’s numbers against the blitz stand out, too. And really the whole group does, at least in comparison to the pressure data. Five different quarterbacks posted a Total QBR above 80 against the blitz last season, led by Cincinnati’s Desmond Ridder. His 87.9 ranked 12th in the FBS, and he threw 18 passing touchdowns with zero interceptions when seeing at least five pass-rushers. Only Will Grier (21) has more passing touchdowns without an interception against the blitz in a season over the past 10 years.
McShay: Ridder reads the field so well and has the foot quickness to maneuver. But he tends to drift backward as a response to inside pressure, and I think he holds on to the ball too long at times — which helps explain his lower number against pressure. But the quarterback who stuck out here was Liberty’s Malik Willis. These are frightening numbers for a first-rounder. Willis has excellent pocket mobility, showing the short-area quickness and overall speed to escape pressure. But then again, he took 51 sacks last season.
According to research from ESPN’s Seth Walder, Willis’ 8.8% career sack rate in college — sacks per dropback — would be the highest for an FBS quarterback selected in the first round since at least 2005 (based on college data back to 2004).
Parolin: Willis is fascinating here. No player in the country forced more missed tackles when blitzed than Willis last season (16), but the sack total suggests he took on a little more than he could escape. Willis became the second FBS quarterback in the past 10 years to take 50 sacks in a season, joining UCLA’s Brett Hundley (52 in 2012). And he did that with a Liberty team that faced one top-20 opponent last season (and he took nine sacks in that one game, a 27-14 loss to Ole Miss).
McShay: Speaking of Ole Miss, tough numbers for Matt Corral, too. On tape, he makes throws with defenders bearing down on him and has more than enough mobility, but he absolutely needs to do a better job with decision-making and ball security when under duress. Also remember that he played in a tempo-based run-pass option offense with the Rebels, and his quick release often got the ball out before a sack (25 sacks taken) but typically not very far downfield.
Parolin: Yeah, and to be fair, there’s no opponent adjustment here, so Corral being the only QB in this sample with an SEC schedule hurt him. He faced five different top-20 opponents last season, and he threw only one interception with eight sacks against the blitz. But Corral did a lot more “surviving” instead of “thriving” in this situation. To your point, Corral’s average throw distance when blitzed was 7.4 yards downfield, 100th out of 124 qualified FBS passers. And only one-third of his blitzed attempts went for first downs, 74th in FBS.
Who thrives when airing it out?
Hitting The Deep Ball (20-Plus Yards Downfield) In 2021
QB COMPLETION % QB OFF-TARGET %
Zappe 53.7% Zappe 20.7%
Pickett 50.8% Ridder 27.9%
Strong 47.5% Pickett 28.8%
Ridder 44.3% Willis 33.3%
Willis 41.3% Corral 34.9%
Corral 39.5% Strong 35.6%
Howell 33.9% Howell 38.2%
2021 FBS averages: 36.6% completion, 38.2% off-target
McShay: I’m pretty shocked here, to be honest. Normally there are slight discrepancies when the numbers and tape don’t totally align, but there are two massive differences in this category for me. I’ll start with UNC’s Sam Howell, whom the tape says has the best deep-ball accuracy in the entire class. And NFL scouts whom I’ve spoken to agree with that. So to see him rank last in both categories is really surprising. His tape shows excellent touch, trajectory and ball placement on deep rail shots and vertical seam passes. He gets decent energy on those throws, though he has an occasional flutter ball.
Parolin: Howell ranked barely ahead of the FBS average in deep miss percentage and was the only QB in the sample below the FBS average in completion percentage. Here are the quarterbacks in the previous three years we’ve looked at who are more likely to miss than complete a deep pass: Tyree Jackson, Jarrett Stidham, Daniel Jones, Anthony Gordon, Jacob Eason, Jake Fromm, Cole McDonald, Shane Buechele, Kellen Mond, Trey Lance and Sam Ehlinger. That’s an underwhelming group, so the contrast with what you see on tape is interesting.
McShay: Howell does have issues with anticipatory throws, especially to the intermediate level. So I could see that being part of it. But yeah, this one is confusing. And on the other end of the spectrum, Western Kentucky’s Bailey Zappe dominated the deep-ball numbers. But on tape, he’s a rhythm passer who excels in the short-to-intermediate range, and he doesn’t always get the correct trajectory on vertical shots. The arm strength is adequate, but the timing is just off a bit. Maybe it’s worth another look. But you also have to factor in Zappe’s competition level and that the Air Raid system for the Hilltoppers predominantly features quick-game throws.
Parolin: Competition questions aside for a moment, we have to acknowledge Zappe’s elite company here. In the past four draft classes, Kyler Murray, Joe Burrow, Mac Jones, Zach Wilson and Zappe are the only players to complete at least half and miss on less than a quarter of their deep throws. Of the four players who aren’t Zappe, the average draft slot of that group is 4.8. Zappe avoided the picks, too, finishing 2021 with 16 touchdown passes and three interceptions on throws deeper than 20 yards. The eternal Air Raid question persists: Can this translate?
McShay: The rest seemed relatively in line with what we know about this class. Willis has the strongest arm, but his accuracy can be inconsistent. Ridder has good zip and nice touch on downfield throws. Pickett has better arm strength than he is given credit for. Nevada’s Carson Strong has a high volume of vertical throws on tape with a good deal of success. And Corral is a quick-game artist.
Which QB hits his spots the best?
Short-To-Intermediate Off-Target Percentage In 2021
QB 10 OR FEWER YARDS DOWNFIELD QB 11-20 YARDS
Corral 2.8% Corral 11.3%
Pickett 3.3% Zappe 13.8%
Willis 3.6% Pickett 14.8%
Howell 4.0% Strong 16.3%
Zappe 4.2% Willis 16.7%
Ridder 4.2% Howell 16.9%
Strong 6.4% Ridder 19.8%
2021 FBS averages: 5.9% short, 17.7% intermediate
McShay: Corral’s fantastic numbers here are obviously what jumps out. And this is his game. He has a snap delivery and gets the ball to receivers in the short-to-intermediate range on a rope. It’s like he places it on a conveyor belt directly to a pass-catcher’s hands. It’s automatic for him in that range, and it was really fun to see on display at his pro day last week. I’d love to see him land in a West Coast, precision-based offense in the NFL.
Parolin: On short throws in particular, he cut the FBS average miss rate in half. How elite was Corral’s short-range accuracy? There were only two other quarterbacks in this exercise over the past three years to miss on less than 3% of short throws — Joe Burrow and Jacob Eason.
McShay: This is another spot where Pickett stands out. He gets the ball out on time and knows how to lead receivers into yards after the catch on passes thrown inside 20 yards downfield. Pickett has really nice touch, especially on timing routes.
Parolin: The class on the whole measures up pretty well. The three previous classes had eight passers above 20% on miss percentage at the intermediate range, but Ridder brings up the rear in 2022 at only 19.8%. Ridder’s short-range accuracy is well ahead of the FBS average, as well, so it doesn’t appear there’s much cause for concern there.
McShay: Yeah, Ridder generally hits his spots on time and with good trajectory. But the tape shows occasional inexplicable misses within the strike zone. Right above Ridder in the intermediate range is Howell. The UNC product’s accuracy dips on anticipation throws, particularly in this range. His feet can get a bit frenzied at the top of his drop, and they aren’t always married to his eyes, which can cause some misses. His pocket-passing mechanics still need a little work.
What kind of QB are you looking for?
Pocket And Off-Platform In 2021
QB TOTAL QBR INSIDE POCKET QB TOTAL QBR OUTSIDE POCKET
Zappe 88.7 Willis 86.6
Pickett 86.0 Ridder 82.1
Strong 77.8 Howell 78.9
Corral 77.6 Pickett 78.6
Ridder 74.3 Corral 54.3
Howell 64.4 Zappe 27.6
Willis 60.2 Strong 19.9
2021 FBS averages: 68.6 in pocket, 62.8 out of pocket
McShay: This speaks directly to Willis’ game. He is magic outside of the pocket, extending and creating. He can change his arm angle and make amazing passes in off-platform situations. And he has the ability, of course, to tuck and run, considering he racked up 1,822 rushing yards and 22 scores on the ground over the past two seasons.
Parolin: Willis’ excellent 86.6 outside-the-pocket QBR came on 143 such plays (third most in the FBS). That’s rate and volume. And Willis got it done both through the air (nine completions for 20-plus yards) and on the ground (572 rush yards outside the pocket, 56 more than any other FBS quarterback last season). He gained over 8 yards per rush outside the pocket and forced an astonishing 55 missed tackles on those plays, 24 more than any other FBS quarterback.
McShay: The trade-off is obviously his in-pocket work. He needs to develop some consistency there, and if you’re drafting him to be an effective pocket passer right away, you’re not going to get it. He can make all the throws, but he misses when his feet aren’t right. He knows it, too. He acknowledged it when I talked to him at his pro day, and he’s working on it. It’s all about marrying his feet to his eyes and driving to and through his target. Willis has to learn to trust his ball placement, change speeds when necessary and get the footwork cleaned up. There’s a lot of potential here, and there’s a reason he’s my top quarterback.
Parolin: The only quarterback above 75 both inside and outside the pocket last year was Pickett, and he was outside the pocket even more than Willis (153 plays). The Pitt star threw 12 passing touchdowns outside the pocket in 2021, two more than any other quarterback, with only one interception. Pickett also added 404 rush yards outside the pocket, and like Willis, he averaged over 8 yards per rush on those plays.
McShay: Because he’s so good inside the pocket, Pickett’s work outside gets overlooked. But these numbers spell it out for us. He makes a lot of difficult throws on the move with accuracy.
Parolin: There’s only one quarterback in this exercise who isn’t below the FBS average in multiple categories, and it’s Zappe. But his 27.6 QBR outside the pocket represents his lowest rank and the only category in which he is below the average mark.
McShay: Yeah, and we can go back to that Western Kentucky pro-style system again. He led the way here in QBR from inside the pocket, but he’s among the worst when forced outside. He saw a lot of simplified reads in college and excelled when he was able to get into a rhythm and distribute from the pocket. Accuracy noticeably dipped when he had to throw on the run, and he isn’t overly elusive.
Strong is another QB who really struggles outside the pocket, and the numbers back up the mobility issues we see on tape. The short-area quickness just isn’t there, and he doesn’t have the agility to extend plays when things break down.
What does the NFL out route show us?
Hitting The Out Route (11-20 Yards Downfield To Outside The Numbers, From Pocket) In 2021
QB COMPLETION PERCENTAGE QB OFF-TARGET PERCENTAGE
Willis 55.6% Willis 11.1%
Howell 53.6% Zappe 18.6%
Ridder 53.1% Ridder 21.9%
Corral 50.0% Strong 22.0%
Zappe 49.2% Corral 22.7%
Strong 48.8% Pickett 23.7%
Pickett 44.7% Howell 28.6%
2021 FBS averages: 47.7% completion, 22.7% off-target
Parolin: Yes, this is a very specific throw, but it’s a very important specific throw. On a 15-yard out route, a QB in the middle of the field is 80 feet from the sideline. That means a “15-yard out” throw actually travels over 30 yards into what can be a very tight window. Rainbow-launch angles won’t work with the sideline, and underthrows invite catastrophe.
McShay: Yeah, these require ball velocity, anticipation, perfect timing and a strong read. Quarterbacks have to release the ball before the break and get it there with enough velocity to hit the window and avoid a defensive back jumping the route. We get a good idea of a quarterback’s arm strength, delivery timing and instincts all at once. But remember to account for the receivers the quarterback is throwing to — more talent on the outside means there is more leeway.
Parolin: The sample matters just as much as the percentages here, since not every college team asks its quarterback to deliver this type of throw. Zappe pops again, besting the FBS averages in both numbers while attempting 59 of these throws last season, second most in the FBS (Fresno State’s Jake Haener threw 65).
Corral had the fewest of our group with just 22 such passes, and he wasn’t particularly accurate. Two quarterbacks (Ridder with six, Strong with five) had as many or more touchdowns on these throws as Corral had misses (five). Willis also had a smaller sample, making just 27 out-route passes, but he was super efficient. He missed on only three of those.
McShay: Yeah, it’s great to see Willis lead these two stats. He has the ball velocity to drive the ball in there. We knew the arm strength was there, but it’s a good sign to see the accuracy line up, too. He gets a ton of zip on these kinds of throws, and it allows him to hit tight windows with a flick of the wrist. And as he becomes more consistent with ball placement, he’s only going to get better here.
Parolin: What about Pickett, who falls below the FBS average in both completion percentage and off-target percentage for these throws? His sample was actually relatively strong with 38 throws. But he had nine misses and an interception while connecting on just 17 of his out-route attempts.
McShay: It’s concerning. We saw some energy on his throws at the Pitt pro day, but he doesn’t have an elite arm. These are high-difficulty passes, and they require a perfect combo of timing, trajectory and velocity. And Pickett has strong overall accuracy. But I might want to take another look at the tape in this area.
Regardless, Pickett arguably shows the most consistency throughout this exercise, and that fits what we’ve said about him: He’s the most NFL-ready quarterback in a weaker class. We don’t draft based on statistics, but when applied in the right way, the numbers can be very helpful when sizing up a group of QBs. And most of what we see here aligns with the scouting.
|