MOST LIKELY TO IMPROVE
Bill Barnwell gives us his 5 teams most likely to improve their win totals.
Before we look at it – the DB has Jets (from 4), Giants (from 4), Jacksonville (from 3), Lions (from 3 and a tie) and Broncos (from 7).
This is one of my favorite weeks every year, as I’m starting my annual look into the NFL teams most likely to improve or decline during the upcoming season. It’s time to take a closer look into what happened a year ago and use history to help project the most surprising teams in 2022.
Heading into last season, despite their 1-5-1 record in games decided by seven points or fewer, the Bengals narrowly missed out on the list of teams most likely to improve. Given that this column identified the 2017 Eagles and 2019 49ers as major improvers before they made their own runs to the Super Bowl, not including the Bengals was disappointing.
The good news is the five teams mentioned in last year’s column all improved, gaining an average of 2.9 wins per 17 games on their 2020 records. (The move from 16 to 17 games means that many of the stats mentioned in this column are a little more torturous to discuss than they were before.) The 49ers and Eagles both went from last place to the playoffs, while the Broncos, Falcons and Jaguars each made smaller strides.
In all, 20 of the 25 teams mentioned in this piece over the past five seasons have improved the following season, rising by an average of 3.1 wins per 17 games. I’ll hit my five favorites for 2022 below, including teams at the top and bottom of the league. I’ll even include an honorable mention for a team that undoubtedly would have been included in this list if it had merely avoided a foolish mistake this offseason. On Wednesday, I’ll hit the five teams most likely to decline.
Buffalo Bills (11-6)
The Bills are a perfect example of how luck and small sample events can play a dramatic role on a team’s record from year to year. Here’s where they ranked in a number of key categories between 2020 and 2021. I won’t include their win-loss record, but using the data below, would you guess they had a better record last season or in 2020?
2021 Bills Vs. 2020 Bills
STAT 2020 2021
DVOA 4 2
FPI 6 2
SRS 5 2
Point Differential 5 1
Points For 2 3
Points Against 16 1
Strength of Schedule) 22 32
Turnover Margin 10 7
The 2020 Bills went 13-3. The 2021 Bills, who were markedly better on a play-by-play and drive-by-drive basis across the board while playing an easier schedule, lost three more games. What changed is how they performed in games decided by seven points or fewer. The 2020 Bills went 4-1 in those close games, which helped get them onto last year’s list as one of the teams most likely to decline.
The 2021 Bills went 0-5 in those same games. Their performance in one-score games didn’t regress to the mean; it regressed all the way past the mean. It’s almost impossible to be as good as they were in 2021 without winning the close ones. Since 1989, only one other team posted a winning record while failing to win a single game by seven points or fewer, when the Super Bowl-winning Rams went 0-3 in those contests in 1999. (They proceeded to win the NFC Championship Game and Super Bowl by a combined 12 points.)
Buffalo, of course, famously did not win a close game in the postseason. After blowing out the Patriots in the wild-card round, it lost an instant classic to the Chiefs despite taking back the lead twice inside the final two minutes. Josh Allen & Co. didn’t get a chance to touch the ball in overtime, leading to complaints their season came down to a coin flip.
If the Bills had been able to pull out the closest of those five one-score games during the regular season, they might not have needed overtime at all.
Allen continued to be an impactful runner, but after an incredible breakout season in 2020, his completion percentage, yards per attempt, interception rate and passer rating were all at or below league average last regular season. Weather was a concern at times, most memorably in the whipping winds against the Patriots in November, but Allen averaged 5.6 yards per attempt and threw two picks in a loss at lowly Jacksonville. He threw for 120 yards and three picks against the Falcons in a game in which Matt Ryan, playing against the league’s best defense, averaged 8.6 yards per attempt. Allen won’t be as dominant as he was during that postseason run, but he’ll be better than the guy we saw struggle at times during the regular season.
The Bills also might be able to count on a step forward from their special teams, which slipped from fourth in the league in DVOA in 2020 to 19th a year ago. Matt Haack ranked as the worst punter in the league by Puntalytics’s metrics. A blocked punt in the opener cost the Bills in a narrow loss to the Steelers, and they ranked 31st in net yards gained per punt. They responded by using a draft pick on “Punt God” Matt Araiza, who boomed a kick 82 yards for a touchback during his first preseason appearance. Haack was released on Monday, which means this is Araiza’s job and Buffalo should be better punting in 2022.
When I talk about punter as a likely place to improve, you know the Bills don’t have many problems on their roster.
– – –
I’m more concerned about the departure of offensive coordinator Brian Daboll, who helped mold Allen from a meme into a superstar. The schedule will be tougher, with the Bills projected to face the league’s 11th-toughest slate, per the Football Outsiders Almanac. It will be tough to ask the defense to improve beyond its first-place ranking in both points allowed and DVOA. I’m not sure Buffalo actually will play better on a snap-by-snap basis than it did in 2021. I just think it will get better results.
Detroit Lions (3-13-1)
Let’s go from one end of the competitiveness spectrum to the other. The Lions were one of the the hard-luck stories of the 2021 season. Seemingly every week, they played their opponents tough into the fourth quarter, only to lose in heartbreaking fashion. Coach Dan Campbell would talk about how close his team was in his postgame news conference, and the cycle would repeat. They started 0-10-1 before finally winning three of their last six, including a victory over a Packers team benching its starters in Week 18.
While Detroit won only three games, its point differential suggests it should have been more successful. It was outscored by about 8.4 points per game. Its Pythagorean expectation, which takes into account points scored and points allowed, suggests the Lions should have won 5.1 games. Giving them a half-win for their tie with the Steelers, they underperformed their Pythagorean expectation by 1.6 wins.
Longtime readers of this column are familiar with the Pythagorean expectation, because it’s the easiest way to find teams that are likely to improve or decline. Let’s take the teams that underperformed their Pythagorean expectation by one to two wins in a given year. Between 1989 and 2019, when the league played under a 16-game schedule, there were 152 such teams.
The following year, those teams improved by an average of 2.1 wins. One hundred and 17 of the 152 teams — nearly 77% of the group — won more games during the subsequent season. If we just focus on teams that underperformed their point differential and failed to win more than 25% of their games — as Detroit did a year ago — the improvements are even more significant: 40 of those 43 teams improved, winning an average of 3.7 more games during the subsequent season.
The Lions went 2-5-1 in games decided by seven points or fewer, with one of the two wins coming against Jordan Love and Green Bay in Week 18.
– – –
In a slightly different universe, the Lions could have been 5-3 in those same games. Their defense wasn’t great and certainly needed to play better in those key moments, but their opponents made sloppy mistakes and weren’t punished in the same way. Defensive coordinator Aaron Glenn’s unit also faced the second-toughest slate of opposing offenses in football, which didn’t help their chances.
The Lions also were the league’s third-most injured team by adjusted games lost. Two of those close losses came under Boyle, who was the league’s third-worst-starting quarterback a year ago, trailing only the Giants duo of Mike Glennon and Jake Fromm. Campbell was frustrated with Jared Goff at times in 2021, but the former Rams starter was much better than Boyle, who returns as the team’s primary backup.
I’m optimistic the Lions will field a more talented team this season. Some of those players given opportunities a year ago emerged as valuable contributors, including defensive end Charles Harris, wide receiver Amani Oruwariye and St. Brown, who had 560 receiving yards and five touchdowns over the final six games of the season. St. Brown and first-round offensive tackle Penei Sewell were the notable standouts from their rookie class, as they fielded the league’s youngest team by snap-weighted age. ESPN has age and snap data going back through 2007, and last year’s Lions were the seventh-youngest team over the past 15 seasons.
I don’t think the Lions are a particularly controversial choice for this list. It might be fair to question what would qualify as a significant improvement for them. With the NFC getting the ninth home game this season and Detroit projected to face the league’s seventh-easiest schedule by Football Outsiders, it should have no trouble getting to five wins. It would likely take seven or more for Campbell & Co. to feel like they’re on track to compete for a postseason berth in 2023.
Baltimore Ravens (8-9)
For the first half of the season, it felt like the Ravens were a candidate to appear on the list of teams most likely to decline in 2022. They started the season 8-3 by going 6-1 in games decided by seven points or fewer, including that dramatic win over the Lions in Week 3. They lived dangerously in wins over the Chiefs (after a late Clyde Edwards-Helaire fumble), Colts (after Rodrigo Blankenship missed a would-be game winner at the end of regulation) and Bears (scoring a touchdown with 22 seconds to go). Baltimore was a classic example of a team that just knew how to win.
And then, just as quickly, things fell apart. The Ravens lost their final six games, in part because quarterback Lamar Jackson suffered a right ankle injury and missed the better part of five weeks.
– – –
They’re here for two reasons. One is that the 2021 Ravens only vaguely resemble the team you’ll see this season. John Harbaugh’s team underwent a catastrophic streak of injuries. By adjusted games lost, they were the most-injured team in the history of the statistic.
The Ravens will be healthier in 2022, if only by sheer chance. They already were down multiple starters at this point of training camp a year ago. It might not be a surprise that the prominent free agents they added this offseason have great track records of health. Tackle Morgan Moses hasn’t missed a game since 2014, while former Saints safety Marcus Williams has missed just four games across five pro seasons. Returning nose tackle Michael Pierce played 60 of 64 games during his first stint with the Ravens, although he opted out of the 2020 season and played only eight games a year ago with the Vikings.
Pierce and Williams are two of the additions I’m counting on for my other argument, which appeals to Baltimore’s organizational culture. I’m simply not willing to believe the Ravens will be as bad on defense in 2022 as they were in 2021.
– – –
This is certainly not a perfect roster. The Ravens are depending on second-year breakouts at wide receiver (Rashod Bateman) and on the edge (Odafe Oweh). The offensive line has questions, especially with Stanley’s ankle still preventing him from practicing. All the players they’re welcoming back are recovering from injuries. Patrick Queen, a first-round pick in 2020, has looked like a rare miss from the Baltimore front office. The 35-year-old Macdonald has one year of defensive playcalling under his belt.
As I look more and more at what we saw from Baltimore in 2021, though, my optimism about its chances grow. No, it wasn’t as good as its 8-3 record from the first half of the season. Even while surviving on fumes for the last six weeks of the year, though, the Ravens were much better than their 0-6 finish. I think they will win the AFC North.
Denver Broncos (7-10)
I can hear what you’re saying. No, you don’t need to be a professional writer to suggest the team that replaced quarterbacks Teddy Bridgewater and Drew Lock with Russell Wilson is likely to win more games. This is not exactly a controversial selection.
This column is mostly concerned with quantitative evidence for why teams are likely to improve or decline, though, and even before the Wilson trade occurred, there were reasons to believe the Broncos were likely to be better this season. The Wilson deal raises their floor and their ceiling, but the Broncos were better than their 7-10 record.
Despite finishing three games below .500, Denver actually outscored its opposition by 13 points. Its Pythagorean expectation was that of an 8.9-win team, nearly two full wins ahead of where it finished.
– – –
The Broncos ranked even higher after Week 14, when they blew out the Lions to make it to 7-6 in the AFC. What happened next led to coach Vic Fangio’s downfall. They lost Bridgewater to a concussion in the third quarter of the following week’s game against the Bengals, but after Lock went in and briefly led them to a lead, the current Seahawks quarterback had the ball ripped out of his hands inside the 10-yard line on a fourth-quarter fumble, costing the Broncos their best chance of topping the eventual AFC champs.
Lock’s run in 2021 was mostly a disaster.
– – –
With Bridgewater on the field, the Broncos averaged 0.06 offensive expected points added (EPA) per snap, which would have been 13th in the league over the full season and placed the them just ahead of the Bengals. Over 221 snaps with Lock on the field, they averaged minus-0.04 EPA per play, which would have come in at 26th and placed them behind the Lions.
Given that Denver lost three of its final four games by a total of 13 points, it’s fair to wonder whether it would have made the playoffs if Bridgewater had been able to play those final four games.
On the whole, the Broncos went 1-4 in games decided by seven points or fewer.
– –
I will admit there are arguments against the Broncos having a Super Bowl ceiling. When Tom Brady was signed by the Buccaneers, I wrote that the Bucs had Super Bowl potential because their defense was secretly great.
– – –
The opposite might be true for the Broncos, who finished third in scoring defense a year ago but finished 20th in defensive DVOA. In this case, they faced just 162 drives, the fewest of any team. They were handed the league’s second-best average starting field position and mostly survived by winning in the red zone, which is an unsustainable way to play defense year after year.
On the other hand, Denver had the league’s third-most injured defense by adjusted games lost and was much worse on third down (26th by DVOA) than it was on first (19th) or second (12th). The Broncos should still field an effective defense in 2022, especially if edge rusher Randy Gregory, their biggest free agent addition, hits the ground running. There will be plenty of competition in the AFC West, but the combination of Wilson and a solid defense typically has been enough to project a playoff appearance.
Here’s where we throw in a sad rejoinder. If there’s any team that would have qualified for this list on paper at the end of the 2021 regular season, it would have been the Seattle Seahawks. The difference between the 2020 and 2021 Seahawks was mostly Wilson getting hurt and their performance in close games. In 2020, they outscored their opponents by 5.5 points per game and went 7-3 in games decided by seven points or fewer. In 2021, they outscored their opponents by 1.7 points per game and went 2-5 in games decided by seven points or fewer. They finished 2.2 wins below their Pythagorean expectation.
Even with the Wilson injury, the Seahawks finished the year as the league’s ninth-best team by DVOA. Nobody plays to win the DVOA trophy, but I’ll wrap up this section by contextualizing what could have been. The last time a team finished in the top 10 of the DVOA rankings while posting a losing record was in 2016, when the 7-9 Eagles finished sixth in DVOA. The following year, they were featured in this very column as the team that had the “… best stat-nerd case for jumping into the postseason in 2017.” They won the Super Bowl.
I can’t put the Seahawks on this list with Lock and Geno Smith as their starting quarterbacks.
Jacksonville Jaguars (3-14)
No team has been more frustrating on this side of the column than the Jaguars, who were highlighted in 2017 as the most likely team in the league to improve. They made a stunning trip to the postseason. They were back on that side of the column again in 2018, only to collapse after a blowout victory over the Patriots. Back again in 2021, they only narrowly improved their record in coach Urban Meyer’s lone season at the helm, going from 1-15 to 3-14.
I’m willing to get hurt again, and it’s not just because the Jaguars have replaced Meyer with Doug Pederson, the guy who led that Eagles team to that stunning Super Bowl victory I just mentioned. Pederson wasn’t the most exciting hire of the offseason, but it’s easy to make the argument that Jacksonville would realize a massive gain by merely having a competent coach who doesn’t allegedly kick his own players in pregame warm-ups.
The Jaguars weren’t particularly bad in close games (2-4) and didn’t really underperform their expected win total (3.4). They did recover a league-low 33.3% of their fumbles, but I wouldn’t use that as my sole reason for putting them on this list. There’s another factor that has a strong track record of regressing toward the mean and driving improvement after a dismal season, and this team fits it better than any other.
Jacksonville posted a minus-20 turnover margin last season. No other team was within seven turnovers of Trevor Lawrence & Co. The Jags posted the fourth-most giveaways and created only nine takeaways on defense, which ranked dead last
– – –
The good news? Teams that post astronomical turnover rates almost always turn that around the following season.
– – –
Posting even a competent turnover margin likely drives a significant improvement for the Jaguars. A year ago, when they either tied or won the turnover battle in their games, they went 3-2. You can probably do the math: When they lost the turnover battle, they went 0-12. Correlation isn’t necessarily causation here, as trailing teams can turn the ball over more easily when they have to throw late in the second half games, but you get the idea. We can feel pretty confident in projecting the Jags to win the turnover battle more often in 2022, and they were already a competent team when they pulled that off in 2021.
There are other reasons to be optimistic. Jacksonville faced a more difficult schedule than expected a year ago, finishing with the league’s 10th-toughest slate, per Football Outsiders. FO projects it to face the league’s sixth-easiest slate this season. The Jaguars do lose another home game for their annual trip to London, but they get six games against the AFC South, which doesn’t project to be a difficult division.
Of course, there’s one other factor beyond numbers suggesting that the Jaguars could take a sudden leap forward: a possible franchise quarterback. Lawrence was erratic and inconsistent in his rookie season, which owed to some combination of his own issues, the league’s highest drop rate and a dysfunctionally coached and operated offense.
We don’t have to think back far to consider a quarterback drafted No. 1 overall whose team went from worst to first in his second season. Joe Burrow was better as a rookie than Lawrence, and he had more coaching stability, but the Bengals’ stunning turnaround last season is yet another reminder of how a superstar quarterback can drastically change the floor and ceiling for a franchise. If Lawrence makes that leap in Year 2, the Jaguars might not remotely resemble that disappointing team.
|